ge ? 2 - SE
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2014-019
TIS 4 yrs, 11 months, 8 days
Policy Implications None
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The applicant was discharged for Misconduct in 2010. The applicant was arrested the same year due to having
possession of numerous files of child pornography. The applicant was still incarcerated by civilian authorities at
the time of the Discharge two months later. The applicant’s command followed proper procedure by providing
the notification for Discharge due to commission of a serious offense. The applicant was advised of his rights to
an attorney and the opportunity to make a statement. 10 days prior to the discharge, the applicant signed the
administrative separation documents to waive any rights while making no objection to discharge.
The board notes that the applicant has only forwarded a receipt from the civilian court to state that the felony
charges have now been expunged in the Fall of 2013. This does not remove or dismiss the wrongdoing or
conviction from the record, rather it removes the offenses from being viewed by the general public to assist the
ability to obtain employment, housing, or credit. Additionally, the applicant does not dispute or provide
evidence to refute the sexual perversion offenses at any time before the separation, or currently. Also of note,
the application enclosed a 2010 memo to discharge that reads a ‘General’ discharge. This memo in 2010 is
referenced in the command’s subsequent memo two months later that quickly addresses the consideration and
recommendation for an Under Other Than Honorable discharge vice the initial General recommendation.
Propriety: Discharge was proper.
Equity: Discharge was equitable.
Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: No relief.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 015
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-015 TIS 5 yrs, 3 months, 9 days Policy Implications None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Pattern Of Misconduct due to making False Official Statements, substandard performance, and an attempt to compromise an End of Course Test. Removal of the scratch paper would have resulted in a test compromise. Applicant was reduced to Pay Grade E-2 as a result of this NJP.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 032
In early 2012, the applicant’s command initiated Discharge proceedings based on the two alcohol incidents. Furthermore, the applicant mentions no details or mitigating factors about the Felony Battery with no contest plea. Prior to epm’s final approval, the Admiral serving as the local Discharge authority fully endorsed the Discharge due to commission of a serious offense with a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service.
CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 091
In the year of 2011, the applicant had two documented alcohol incidents and received NJP for the aforementioned UCMJ Articles 92, 107 and 128. As of ALCOAST 125/10, the SPD code of JND is prescribed for individuals with two accumulated alcohol incidents. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 063
The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The applicant was given an Honorable Discharge and the most favorable Narrative Reason for separation. Administrative change will be made to the correct Separation Authority to COMDTINST M1000.4, Art.
CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 012
The Board notes the admission of the illegal use of Testosterone along with the inability to provide said prescription meets the equity and propriety standards for the HKK SPD code. The applicant was notified of the intent to discharge, and the applicant was advised of the rights to an attorney and to make a statement. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s...
CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 016
CORRECTIONS TIS 3 yrs, 3 months, 6 days Policy Implications _| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Unsuitability due to Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure in the summer of 2006. On the equity standard, the board referred to ALCOAST 125/10, to make a recommendation on the Narrative Reason (NR) for his separation. The Board notes most or all separations occurring after said ALCOAST to present, only issue a JPD (SPD) code when the member is unable to complete outpatient...
CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2009-146
This final decision, dated February 25, 2010, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant, who received a general discharge under honorable conditions from the Coast Guard on August 30, 2003, for misconduct, asked the Board to correct his record by upgrading his discharge to honorable. The CO advised the applicant that he was recommending that he receive a general dis- charge but that Commander, Coast Guard Personnel Command (CGPC) would decide...
CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 029
In 2010, the applicant pled ‘no contest’ in a civilian court to third degree assault consummated by Battery. The Board has no issues with the discharge issued. The local command, intermediate level Commander, and EPM all endorsed the punishment rendered and the subsequent separation.
CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 032
The NJP results specify that the spouse had suffered a fractured nose and received stitches. The separation package does show an Honorable recommendation from the Sector, but this is due to the pattern of misconduct vice the voluntary plea on the application and supporting statements. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.
CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 033
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2014-033 NAME E3 CURRENT DD-214 Under Honorable Conditions, CGPSC-EPM, JKQ, Misconduct, RE4 RELIEF REQUESTED | Honorable RELIEF GRANTED Honorable, JND SPD code, Separation for Miscellaneous/General Reasons BY DRB ADMIN None CORRECTIONS TIS 2 yrs, 3 months, 6 days Policy Implications __| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Misconduct due to Commission of a Serious Offense in 2013. The command recommended the applicant for an...